• Those in support of the proposal...

    • Of the 18 participants who supported the proposal, there were no further comments provided.
  • Those not in support the proposal said...

    • strong objection to the sale, should invest in reserve.
    • intended as public open space in the land subdivision and is used by locals.
    • nearby Linear Park floods, is unsafe, and poorly accessible for elderly/mobility impaired.
    • ecological value for native/endangered species.
    • concerns for financially motivation and distrust around how proceeds will be used.
    • reserve is safe, inclusive, and valued by older residents and those without access to other facilities.
    • cultural significance for Kaurna people
  • Those who were unsure said....

    • concern that public land should not be sold into private ownership.
    • While the reserve is regularly used by the community, there is objection to revoking the entire site.
    • if only part of the site were revoked and sold, the proceeds could be reinvested into enhancing the remaining reserve.
    • while objections were framed around community use of the reserve, underlying concerns about potential loss of sea views have also influenced these responses.

Can you spare another minute to tell us how we did?

Your feedback will help us improve the way we engage